For my political comments please see the general blog.
Anybody with a better illustration of the ' Westminster Show ' [ I mean allowances for third homes to cure dry rot, islands in duck ponds, or £18,000 book cases, etc ] please post it for everybody to have a laugh. [ It should make most of us weep over the incompetance of our 'leaders' ].
Access
Group avatar
Members (470)
Recent comments
- jenray pro on: Coming out fully
- isadora101 on: A present
- isadora101 on: A present
- isadora101 on: A present
- isadora101 on: A present
- la_spice on: A present
- gardengirl on: ITALIAN RUSTY FOR USKY
- MarikaSunSeeker on: Coming out fully
- MarikaSunSeeker on: A present
- jenray pro on: Coming out fully
- Show more
Archives
- November 2009 (36)
- October 2009 (78)
- September 2009 (67)
- August 2009 (109)
- July 2009 (101)
- June 2009 (153)
- May 2009 (133)
- April 2009 (114)
- March 2009 (78)
- February 2009 (80)
- January 2009 (104)
- December 2008 (77)
- November 2008 (117)
- October 2008 (125)
- September 2008 (102)
- August 2008 (178)
- July 2008 (260)
- June 2008 (298)
- May 2008 (237)
- April 2008 (250)
- March 2008 (402)
- February 2008 (303)
- more...
Search
Calendar
Subscribe by email
You can receive the posts of this weblog by email.
MPs leading us a fine old dance !!!!!!!!!
Trackback address for this post:
Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments
Subject matter (to a point) I sort of agree as it making a point regarding the title..... composition wise. Not brilliant IMHO... A side note.... Blown out sky, Garish red dress,blurry faces.... Maybe I got this post's interpretation all wrong???? If it WAS (or is) a statement, then maybe a photo Blog is not the best place to display it???? Horses for courses???? Just my opinion, not a dig..... I thing pics of flowers get most comments................
Regards,Steve
I'm overcome with your kind comments. David.
It is meant to be cartoon like ; isn't that clear ?
| Esspee [Member] 20/05/09 @ 23:42 |
It was quite quickly after re-reading..... But I had already commented below this comment. Before you replied to this. Your two replies were AFTER my SECOND reply!!! Go figure........
| Esspee [Member] 20/05/09 @ 23:13 |
I apologise, I did not know where you were coming from, I re-read, please disregard my last comment (ish) I still think it is a poorly defined interpretation of a subject unless you are Andy Warhol......... Steve
| Esspee [Member] 20/05/09 @ 23:45 |
I made this BEFORE the reply from David. Go figure
The image was taken last August before the news of ' Expenses and Allowances' scandal broke; you pull out something better to illustrate the subject from your library of images. I await your example(s) with interest! David
Leave a comment :
Recent Posts
-
Fire
on Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009 -
A present
on Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009 -
Coming out fully
on Friday, Nov. 20, 2009 -
Benidorm Blur!
on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009 -
RE-Visited
on Thursday, Nov. 19, 2009 -
ABANDONED BOAT
on Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009 -
THE SHUTTER
on Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009 -
God Hates his 'feathered friends'...
on Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009 -
Berries.
on Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009 -
Conservatory flowers
on Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009




















20/05/09 @ 23:07