Here's one I took a few nights ago when it was almost dark. I think the blurring of the sea against the unblurred rocks and breakwater looks pretty spooky. It really needs to be seen bigger, so please click on it,.
Cheers, Tom.
Your pictures – all are welcome.
You can receive the posts of this weblog by email.
Here's one I took a few nights ago when it was almost dark. I think the blurring of the sea against the unblurred rocks and breakwater looks pretty spooky. It really needs to be seen bigger, so please click on it,.
Cheers, Tom.
EXCELLENT!!!!!!
Can't add to that.
| SeasideMan pro 14/05/08 @ 11:05 |
Thanks, that one did turn out pretty well. The other 99 didn't though...
Cheers, Tom.
very nice, it does a little spooky
Rabbit
| SeasideMan pro 14/05/08 @ 13:00 |
Thanks, I'll be trying more of those when it's high tide at sundown in a week or so.
Cheers, Tom.
| paparazzistyle pro 15/05/08 @ 16:56 |
Cracking shot Tom, good light doesn't have to be bright !
| SeasideMan pro 15/05/08 @ 17:16 |
I rather like the idea of getting a darkness filter so that I can do this sort of thing in bright light. Have you ever tried such a thing?
Tom.
| paparazzistyle pro 16/05/08 @ 11:48 |
They used to use a night filter in low budget movies but the shadows were always too strong.
If it was easy it would not be as much fun or as rewarding.
I take pictures using the "wrong" colour balance all the time,
using tungsten balance in poor lighting conditions can be good
especially if the image relies on tonal perspective.
| SeasideMan pro 16/05/08 @ 12:27 |
Ah, that makes sense about low budget films. I've noticed that effect, but assumed it was down to cheap film-stock.
Thanks for the information.
Cheers, Tom.
14/05/08 @ 10:48