Good advice for all of us, I think.  How Dan managed to contort himself into that shape in the 2nd picture I really don't know. Unusually, he has taken his eye off the ball too. Both pictures get bigger if you click on them, and there is a green ball in both.

Cheers, Tom.

What NO PICTURE?

Marian

There is a petition on the 10 downing street website, which is as follows:

Through history, we have documented the world around us, whether through written word, art or photography.

Photography in particular has provided fantastic insights into the past and present, and is a hobby enjoyed by millions of people worldwide.

But today, it's becoming increasingly difficult to take photos of our surroundings, particularly in cities like London.

In recent years, the price divide between professional and consumer equipment has blurred, and it's quite common these days to see amateurs and hobbyists carrying around tripods, SLR cameras and a backpack full of equipment.

Yet, we are constantly harrassed by security guards and police officers in the name of preventing terrorism. They seem to be operating under a different interpretation of the law to the rest of us, believing that somehow the length of your lens, or size of your camera is relevant.

We would like clarification by the goverment on the law regarding photography of buildings and landmarks from public locations.
If you wish to sign this petition, then go to http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/photographylaw/#detail
Then you can add your name to the petition, if you agree. If this has been brought to your attention on a prior post, then I apologise for wasting your time. Yours King Gog of Gog.